- From: Bert Bos via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:42:07 +0000
- To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-background
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv17549
Modified Files:
Overview.src.html
Log Message:
Expanded Changes section with links and changed text fragments with
<ins>/<del> mark-up.
Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-background/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.288
retrieving revision 1.289
diff -u -d -r1.288 -r1.289
--- Overview.src.html 9 Feb 2012 15:29:22 -0000 1.288
+++ Overview.src.html 9 Feb 2012 15:42:05 -0000 1.289
@@ -3233,26 +3233,98 @@
Candidate Recommendation</a>:
<ul>
- <li>Defined what happens if 'background-position' has two ''auto'' values
+ <li><a href="#the-background-size">Section 3.9</a>:
+ Defined what happens if 'background-position' has two ''auto'' values
and the image is missing an intrinsic dimension.
- <li>Made center of <a href="#corner-transitions">color and style transitions</a>
+ <blockquote>
+ <p>If both values are ‘auto’ then the intrinsic width and/or
+ height of the image should be used, if any<ins>, the missing
+ dimension (if any) behaving as ‘auto’ as described above</ins>.
+ </blockquote>
+ <li><a href="#corner-transitions">Section 5.4</a>:
+ Made center of <a href="#corner-transitions">color and style transitions</a>
undefined (within certain limits) on corner joins, since previous definition
was wrong.
- <li>Defined <a href="#the-border-image-slice">slicing of border images</a>
+ <blockquote>
+ <p><del>The center of color and style transitions between
+ adjoining borders is at the point on the curve that is at an angle
+ that is proportional to the ratio of the border widths. For
+ example, if the top and right border widths are equal, that point
+ is at a 45° angle from the horizontal, and if the top is twice the
+ width of the right the point is at a 30° angle from the
+ horizontal. The line demarcating this transition is drawn between
+ the point at that angle on the outer arc and the point at that
+ angle on the inner arc.</del>
+ <p><ins>If one of these borders is zero-width, then the other
+ border takes up the entire transitional area. Otherwise, the
+ center of color and style transitions between adjoining borders
+ must be proportional to the ratio of the border widths such that a
+ function of its location is continuous with respect to this ratio.
+ However it is not defined what these transitions look like or how
+ “proportional” maps to a point on the curve.</ins>
+ </blockquote>
+ <li><a href="#the-border-image-slice">Section 6.2</a>:
+ Defined <a href="#the-border-image-slice">slicing of border images</a>
that must be sized first to determine slice positions.
- <li>Optionally added bidi-imposed breaks to the types of breaks affected by
+ Added:
+ <blockquote>
+ <p><ins>If the image must be sized to determine the slices (for
+ example, for SVG images with no intrinsic size), then it is sized
+ as for an auto-sized background, using the border image area as
+ the default object size in place of the background positioning
+ area.</ins>
+ </blockquote>
+ <li><a href="#the-box-decoration-break">Section 7.1</a>
+ Optionally added bidi-imposed breaks to the types of breaks affected by
'box-decoration-break'.
- <li>Defined the default color of 'box-shadow'.
- <li>Clarified computed value of 'background-position'.
- <li>Added "Animatable" line to property definition tables.
- <li>Renamed <bg-position> production to <i><position></i> for
+ Added:
+ <blockquote>
+ <p><ins>UAs may also apply ‘box-decoration-break’ to control
+ rendering at bidi-imposed breaks, i.e. when bidi reordering causes
+ an inline to split into non-contiguous fragments. Otherwise such
+ breaks are always handled as ‘slice’.</ins>
+ </blockquote>
+ <li><a href="#the-box-shadow">Section 7.2</a>:
+ Defined the default color of 'box-shadow'.
+ <blockquote>
+ <p>The color is the color of the shadow. <ins>If the color is
+ absent, the used color is taken from the ‘color’ property.</ins>
+ </blockquote>
+ <li><a href="#the-background-position">Section 3.6</a>:
+ Clarified computed value of 'background-position'.
+ <blockquote>
+ <p><del>If one or two values are specified, for a <length> the
+ absolute length, otherwise a percentage. If three or four values
+ are specified, two pairs of a keyword plus a length or
+ percentage.</del> <ins>Two keywords representing the origin and
+ two offsets from that origin, each given as an absolute length (if
+ given a <length>), otherwise as a percentage.</ins>
+ </blockquote>
+ <p>Changed <del>Equivalent</del> to <ins>Computes</ins> in
+ definition of keywords.
+ <p>Also made the grammar more readable.
+ <li><a href="#animations">Section 2.3</a> (and all property definitions):
+ Added a section about expected an expected animations module.
+ Added "Animatable" line to property definition tables.
+ <li><a href="#the-background-position">Section 3.6</a>:
+ Renamed <bg-position> production to <i><position></i> for
easier re-use in other specifications and recast the grammar to be more
verbose but easier to understand.
- <li>Added ''space'' keyword to 'border-image-repeat' property value table:
+ <li><a href="#the-border-image-repeat">Section 6.5</a>:
+ Added ''space'' keyword to 'border-image-repeat' property value table:
it was included in the list of allowable values, but not in the syntax
definition.
- <li>Corrected math error in border-radius example.
- <li>Marked Percentages field as N/A for 'border-width', since they are not
+ <blockquote>
+ <p>[ stretch | repeat | round <ins>| space</ins> ]{1,2}
+ </blockquote>
+ <li><a href="#corner-overlap">Section 5.5</a>:
+ Corrected math error in border-radius example.
+ <blockquote>
+ <p>The height (2.5em) is enough for the specified radii (0.5em
+ plus <del>2.5em</del> <ins>2.0em</ins>).
+ </blockquote>
+ <li><a href="#the-border-width">Section 4.3</a>:
+ Marked Percentages field as N/A for 'border-width', since they are not
included in the property.
</ul>
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 15:42:09 UTC