csswg/css3-values Overview.html,1.101,1.102 Overview.src.html,1.104,1.105

Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-values
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv18661

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
Kill the 'attr() with keyword type?' issue.  out-of-scope, per introductory paragraph.

Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-values/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.101
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -u -d -r1.101 -r1.102
--- Overview.html	10 Oct 2011 21:55:10 -0000	1.101
+++ Overview.html	10 Oct 2011 21:56:00 -0000	1.102
@@ -1641,9 +1641,6 @@
     relevant units.
   </dl>
 
-  <p class=issue>Should there also be a "keyword" type to, e.g., support
-   &lsquo;<code class=css>float: attr(align)</code>&rsquo;
-
   <p class=issue>Ideally, it shouldn't be necessary to specify the type if it
    is obvious. For example, this should be valid: &lsquo;<code
    class=css>background-image: attr(href);</code>&rsquo;. This could be

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-values/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.104
retrieving revision 1.105
diff -u -d -r1.104 -r1.105
--- Overview.src.html	10 Oct 2011 21:55:11 -0000	1.104
+++ Overview.src.html	10 Oct 2011 21:56:00 -0000	1.105
@@ -1147,8 +1147,6 @@
 		units.
 	</dl>
 
-	<p class="issue">Should there also be a "keyword" type to, e.g., support ''float: attr(align)''</p>
-
 	<p class="issue">Ideally, it shouldn't be necessary to specify the
 	type if it is obvious. For example, this should be valid:
 	''background-image: attr(href);''. This could be described as:

Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 21:56:07 UTC