csswg/css3-lists Overview.html,1.46,1.47 Overview.src.html,1.88,1.89

Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-lists
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv22006

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
Added an issue about upper-greek and lower-greek.


Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-lists/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.46
retrieving revision 1.47
diff -u -d -r1.46 -r1.47
--- Overview.html	20 May 2011 00:28:18 -0000	1.46
+++ Overview.html	20 May 2011 00:36:03 -0000	1.47
@@ -3566,7 +3566,7 @@
 	type: additive;
 	range: 1 999;
 	additive-glyphs: 900 '\3E1', 800 '\3C9', 700 '\3C8', 600 '\3C7', 500 '\3C6', 400 '\3C5', 300 '\3C4', 200 '\3C3', 100 '\3C1', 90 '\3DF', 80 '\3C0', 70 '\3BF', 60 '\3BE', 50 '\3BD', 40 '\3BC', 30 '\3BB', 20 '\3BA', 10 '\3B9', 9 '\3B8', 8 '\3B7', 7 '\3B6', 6 '\3C3\3C4', 5 '\3B4', 4 '\3B3', 3 '\3B2', 2 '\3B1', 1 '\3B0';
-	/* 900 'ϡ', 800 'ω', 700 'ψ', 600 'χ', 500 'φ', 400 'υ', 300 'τ', 200 'σ', 100 'ρ', 90 'ϟ', 80 'π', 70 'ο', 60 'ξ', 50 'ν', 40 'μ', 30 'λ', 20 'κ', 10 'ι', 9 'θ', 8 'η', 7 'ζ', 6 '', 5 'ε', 4 'δ', 3 'γ', 2 'β', 1 'α' */
+	/* 900 'ϡ', 800 'ω', 700 'ψ', 600 'χ', 500 'φ', 400 'υ', 300 'τ', 200 'σ', 100 'ρ', 90 'ϟ', 80 'π', 70 'ο', 60 'ξ', 50 'ν', 40 'μ', 30 'λ', 20 'κ', 10 'ι', 9 'θ', 8 'η', 7 'ζ', 6 'στ', 5 'ε', 4 'δ', 3 'γ', 2 'β', 1 'α' */
 }
 	</bdo></code></pre>
 
@@ -3577,7 +3577,12 @@
    correct? (Having the multiplier be 1000 means that you can potentially
    write the thousands digit two ways, using either the set of thousands
    digits or the set of ones digits with a circumflex. The examples given in
-   the note appear to use the former.)</p>
+   the note appear to use the former.)
+
+  <p class=issue>According to a native Greek speaker, the lower-greek and
+   upper-greek styles aren't actually used. I've removed upper-greek for now,
+   but kept lower-greek because CSS2.1 included the keyword. Do these have
+   actual use-cases?</p>
   <!-- ======================================================================= -->
 
   <h2 id=optional-extensions><span class=secno>12. </span> Optional Extended

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-lists/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.88
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -d -r1.88 -r1.89
--- Overview.src.html	20 May 2011 00:28:18 -0000	1.88
+++ Overview.src.html	20 May 2011 00:36:03 -0000	1.89
@@ -2885,12 +2885,14 @@
 	type: additive;
 	range: 1 999;
 	additive-glyphs: 900 '\3E1', 800 '\3C9', 700 '\3C8', 600 '\3C7', 500 '\3C6', 400 '\3C5', 300 '\3C4', 200 '\3C3', 100 '\3C1', 90 '\3DF', 80 '\3C0', 70 '\3BF', 60 '\3BE', 50 '\3BD', 40 '\3BC', 30 '\3BB', 20 '\3BA', 10 '\3B9', 9 '\3B8', 8 '\3B7', 7 '\3B6', 6 '\3C3\3C4', 5 '\3B4', 4 '\3B3', 3 '\3B2', 2 '\3B1', 1 '\3B0';
-	/* 900 'ϡ', 800 'ω', 700 'ψ', 600 'χ', 500 'φ', 400 'υ', 300 'τ', 200 'σ', 100 'ρ', 90 'ϟ', 80 'π', 70 'ο', 60 'ξ', 50 'ν', 40 'μ', 30 'λ', 20 'κ', 10 'ι', 9 'θ', 8 'η', 7 'ζ', 6 '', 5 'ε', 4 'δ', 3 'γ', 2 'β', 1 'α' */
+	/* 900 'ϡ', 800 'ω', 700 'ψ', 600 'χ', 500 'φ', 400 'υ', 300 'τ', 200 'σ', 100 'ρ', 90 'ϟ', 80 'π', 70 'ο', 60 'ξ', 50 'ν', 40 'μ', 30 'λ', 20 'κ', 10 'ι', 9 'θ', 8 'η', 7 'ζ', 6 'στ', 5 'ε', 4 'δ', 3 'γ', 2 'β', 1 'α' */
 }
 	</bdo></code></pre>
 
 	<p class=issue>Per <a href="http://www.ethiopic.org/w3c/css/WD-css3-lists-20020220-comments.html#armenianlists">http://www.ethiopic.org/w3c/css/WD-css3-lists-20020220-comments.html#armenianlists</a>, putting the circumflex above a digit in armenian numbering multiplies the digit by 1000.  The draft currently states a 10,000 multiplier.  Which is correct? (Having the multiplier be 1000 means that you can potentially write the thousands digit two ways, using either the set of thousands digits or the set of ones digits with a circumflex.  The examples given in the note appear to use the former.)</p>
 
+	<p class=issue>According to a native Greek speaker, the lower-greek and upper-greek styles aren't actually used.  I've removed upper-greek for now, but kept lower-greek because CSS2.1 included the keyword.  Do these have actual use-cases?</p>
+
 
 <!-- ======================================================================= -->
 

Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 00:36:07 UTC