- From: Elika Etemad via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 06:13:50 +0000
- To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css-2010
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv22977
Modified Files:
Overview.html Overview.src.html
Log Message:
Fix grammar error
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css-2010/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -d -r1.15 -r1.16
--- Overview.html 5 May 2011 00:18:49 -0000 1.15
+++ Overview.html 5 May 2011 06:13:48 -0000 1.16
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@
Drafts. This avoids incompatibilities with future changes in the draft.
<p class=note>For legacy reasons, certain experimental CSS properties do
- not follow this prefixing convention. Three common examples are the
+ not follow this prefixing convention. Two common examples are the
‘<code class=property>word-wrap</code>’ and ‘<code
class=property>text-overflow</code>’ properties, which were
introduced unprefixed by Microsoft Internet Explorer prior to the
Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css-2010/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -d -r1.16 -r1.17
--- Overview.src.html 5 May 2011 00:18:49 -0000 1.16
+++ Overview.src.html 5 May 2011 06:13:48 -0000 1.17
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
</p>
<p class="note">For legacy reasons, certain experimental CSS properties
-do not follow this prefixing convention. Three common examples are the
+do not follow this prefixing convention. Two common examples are the
'word-wrap' and 'text-overflow' properties,
which were introduced unprefixed by Microsoft Internet Explorer prior
to the introduction of the vendor prefixing policy in CSS2.1 and were
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 06:13:52 UTC