- From: Elika Etemad via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:15:52 +0000
- To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css-2007
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv30393
Modified Files:
Overview.html Overview.src.html
Log Message:
Use 'demonstrate to be' wording
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css-2007/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -d -r1.3 -r1.4
--- Overview.html 2 May 2011 22:53:57 -0000 1.3
+++ Overview.html 4 May 2011 21:15:50 -0000 1.4
@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@
<h1>Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Snapshot 2007</h1>
- <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=w3c-note-date>W3C Note 2 May 2011</h2>
+ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=w3c-note-date>W3C Note 4 May 2011</h2>
<dl>
<dt>This version:</dt>
- <!-- <dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css-beijing-20110502/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-css-beijing-20110502/</a></dd> -->
+ <!-- <dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css-beijing-20110504/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-css-beijing-20110504/</a></dd> -->
<dd><a
href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-2007/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-2007/</a>
@@ -353,5 +353,5 @@
CSS Working Drafts also use vendor-prefixed property or value names. This
avoids any incompatibilities with future changes in the draft. Once a
specification reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage, implementors
- should implement the non-prefixed syntax for any feature they consider to
- be correctly implemented according to spec.
+ should implement the non-prefixed syntax for any feature they can
+ demonstrate to be correctly implemented according to spec.
Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css-2007/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -d -r1.3 -r1.4
--- Overview.src.html 2 May 2011 22:53:57 -0000 1.3
+++ Overview.src.html 4 May 2011 21:15:50 -0000 1.4
@@ -247,5 +247,5 @@
CSS Working Drafts also use vendor-prefixed property or value names. This
avoids any incompatibilities with future changes in the draft. Once a
specification reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage, implementors
-should implement the non-prefixed syntax for any feature they consider to
-be correctly implemented according to spec.</p>
+should implement the non-prefixed syntax for any feature they can demonstrate
+to be correctly implemented according to spec.</p>
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 21:15:54 UTC