- From: Elika Etemad via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 23:00:45 +0000
- To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css-2010
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv17168
Modified Files:
Overview.html Overview.src.html
Log Message:
Split paragraph
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css-2010/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -d -r1.10 -r1.11
--- Overview.html 2 May 2011 22:58:12 -0000 1.10
+++ Overview.html 2 May 2011 23:00:43 -0000 1.11
@@ -365,10 +365,11 @@
<p>To avoid clashes with future CSS features, the CSS2.1 specification
reserves a <a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords">prefixed
- syntax</a> for proprietary and experimental extensions to CSS. Prior to a
- specification reaching the Candidate Recommendation stage in the W3C
- process, all implementations of a CSS feature are considered experimental.
- The CSS Working Group recommends that implementations use the
+ syntax</a> for proprietary and experimental extensions to CSS.
+
+ <p>Prior to a specification reaching the Candidate Recommendation stage in
+ the W3C process, all implementations of a CSS feature are considered
+ experimental. The CSS Working Group recommends that implementations use a
vendor-prefixed syntax for such features, including those in W3C Working
Drafts. This avoids incompatibilities with future changes in the draft.
Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css-2010/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -d -r1.11 -r1.12
--- Overview.src.html 2 May 2011 22:58:12 -0000 1.11
+++ Overview.src.html 2 May 2011 23:00:43 -0000 1.12
@@ -240,11 +240,12 @@
<p>To avoid clashes with future CSS features, the CSS2.1 specification
reserves a <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords">prefixed
-syntax</a> for proprietary and experimental extensions to CSS. Prior
-to a specification reaching the Candidate Recommendation stage in the
-W3C process, all implementations of a CSS feature are considered
+syntax</a> for proprietary and experimental extensions to CSS.
+
+<p>Prior to a specification reaching the Candidate Recommendation stage
+in the W3C process, all implementations of a CSS feature are considered
experimental. The CSS Working Group recommends that implementations
-use the vendor-prefixed syntax for such features, including those in
+use a vendor-prefixed syntax for such features, including those in
W3C Working Drafts. This avoids incompatibilities with future changes
in the draft.
</p>
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 23:00:46 UTC