- From: Tab Atkins Jr.. via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:37:56 +0000
- To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-images
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv9733
Modified Files:
Overview.html Overview.src.html
Log Message:
Re-added the new values for object-fit, though tagged them with an issue.
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -d -r1.73 -r1.74
--- Overview.html 22 Feb 2011 19:52:16 -0000 1.73
+++ Overview.html 23 Feb 2011 16:37:54 -0000 1.74
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
<h1>CSS Image Values and Replaced Content Module Level 3</h1>
- <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 22 February
+ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 23 February
2011</h2>
<dl>
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
<dt>Previous Version:
<dd><a
+ href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-images-20110217/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-images-20110217/</a>
+
+ <dd><a
href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-images-20090723/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-images-20090723/</a>
<dt>Editor:
@@ -1374,7 +1377,7 @@
<tr>
<th>Value:
- <td>fill | contain | cover
+ <td>fill | contain | cover <span class=issue>| none | scale-down</span>
<tr>
<th>Initial:
@@ -1472,23 +1475,31 @@
the smallest size such that the width of the contents is greater than or
equal to the used width of the box and the height of the contents is
greater than or equal to the height of the box.</p>
- </dd>
- <!-- Commented out for WD publication
- <dt>none</dt>
- <dd>
- <p>Determine the used ‘<code class=property>height</code>’ and ‘<code class=property>width</code>’ <a href="/TR/CSS21/visudet.html">as
- usual</a>. If the content has an intrinsic height and width, do not
- scale it. Otherwise, this value must be treated as ‘<code class=css>fill</code>’.</p>
- </dd>
-
- <dt>scale-down <b class=issue>better name?</i></dt>
- <dd>
- <p>This value must act identically to ‘<code class=css>none</code>’ or ‘<code class=css>contain</code>’, whichever
- would make the contents smaller.</p>
- </dd>
- -->
+
+ <dt>none
+
+ <dd>
+ <p>Determine the used ‘<code class=property>height</code>’
+ and ‘<code class=property>width</code>’ <a
+ href="/TR/CSS21/visudet.html">as usual</a>. If the content has an
+ intrinsic height and width, do not scale it. Otherwise, this value must
+ be treated as ‘<code class=css>fill</code>’.</p>
+
+ <dt>scale-down <b class=issue>better name?</b>
+
+ <dd>
+ <p>This value must act identically to ‘<code
+ class=css>none</code>’ or ‘<code
+ class=css>contain</code>’, whichever would make the contents
+ smaller.</p>
</dl>
+ <p class=issue>ISSUE: ‘<code class=property>none</code>’ and
+ ‘<code class=property>scale-down</code>’ are a bit
+ controversial. Need some discussion on use-cases for each. Particularly,
+ is there existing content behavior (perhaps surrounding <object>) that
+ requires one of these values?
+
<p>The ‘<code class=property>overflow</code>’ property
determines how to render parts of the replaced element's content that
extend beyond the edges of its box. See the ‘<a
Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.75
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u -d -r1.75 -r1.76
--- Overview.src.html 22 Feb 2011 19:52:16 -0000 1.75
+++ Overview.src.html 23 Feb 2011 16:37:54 -0000 1.76
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/">http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/</a></dd>
<dt>Previous Version:</dt>
+ <dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-images-20110217/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-images-20110217/</a></dd>
<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-images-20090723/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-images-20090723/</a></dd>
<dt>Editor:</dt>
@@ -1035,7 +1036,7 @@
<td><dfn>object-fit</dfn>
<tr>
<th>Value:
- <td>fill | contain | cover
+ <td>fill | contain | cover <span class=issue>| none | scale-down</span>
<tr>
<th>Initial:
<td>fill
@@ -1104,7 +1105,7 @@
the used width of the box and the height of the contents is greater than or
equal to the height of the box.</p>
</dd>
- <!-- Commented out for WD publication
+
<dt>none</dt>
<dd>
<p>Determine the used 'height' and 'width' <a href="/TR/CSS21/visudet.html">as
@@ -1117,9 +1118,12 @@
<p>This value must act identically to ''none'' or ''contain'', whichever
would make the contents smaller.</p>
</dd>
- -->
</dl>
+ <p class=issue>ISSUE: 'none' and 'scale-down' are a bit controversial. Need some
+ discussion on use-cases for each. Particularly, is there existing content behavior
+ (perhaps surrounding <object>) that requires one of these values?</p>
+
<p>The 'overflow' property determines how to render parts of the replaced
element's content that extend beyond the edges of its box. See the
'object-position' property for positioning the object with respect to the
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 16:37:58 UTC