W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-commits@w3.org > February 2011

csswg/css3-images Overview.html,1.73,1.74 Overview.src.html,1.75,1.76

From: Tab Atkins Jr.. via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:37:56 +0000
To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PsHiv-0002Yf-0C@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-images
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv9733

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
Re-added the new values for object-fit, though tagged them with an issue.


Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -d -r1.73 -r1.74
--- Overview.html	22 Feb 2011 19:52:16 -0000	1.73
+++ Overview.html	23 Feb 2011 16:37:54 -0000	1.74
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 
    <h1>CSS Image Values and Replaced Content Module Level 3</h1>
 
-   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 22 February
+   <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 23 February
     2011</h2>
 
    <dl>
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@
     <dt>Previous Version:
 
     <dd><a
+     href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-images-20110217/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-images-20110217/</a>
+
+    <dd><a
      href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-images-20090723/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-images-20090723/</a>
 
     <dt>Editor:
@@ -1374,7 +1377,7 @@
     <tr>
      <th>Value:
 
-     <td>fill | contain | cover
+     <td>fill | contain | cover <span class=issue>| none | scale-down</span>
 
     <tr>
      <th>Initial:
@@ -1472,23 +1475,31 @@
      the smallest size such that the width of the contents is greater than or
      equal to the used width of the box and the height of the contents is
      greater than or equal to the height of the box.</p>
-   </dd>
-   <!-- Commented out for WD publication
-		<dt>none</dt>
-		<dd>
-			<p>Determine the used &lsquo;<code class=property>height</code>&rsquo; and &lsquo;<code class=property>width</code>&rsquo; <a href="/TR/CSS21/visudet.html">as
-			usual</a>.  If the content has an intrinsic height and width, do not
-			scale it.  Otherwise, this value must be treated as &lsquo;<code class=css>fill</code>&rsquo;.</p>
-		</dd>
-
-		<dt>scale-down <b class=issue>better name?</i></dt>
-		<dd>
-			<p>This value must act identically to &lsquo;<code class=css>none</code>&rsquo; or &lsquo;<code class=css>contain</code>&rsquo;, whichever 
-			would make the contents smaller.</p>
-		</dd>
-	-->
+
+   <dt>none
+
+   <dd>
+    <p>Determine the used &lsquo;<code class=property>height</code>&rsquo;
+     and &lsquo;<code class=property>width</code>&rsquo; <a
+     href="/TR/CSS21/visudet.html">as usual</a>. If the content has an
+     intrinsic height and width, do not scale it. Otherwise, this value must
+     be treated as &lsquo;<code class=css>fill</code>&rsquo;.</p>
+
+   <dt>scale-down <b class=issue>better name?</b>
+
+   <dd>
+    <p>This value must act identically to &lsquo;<code
+     class=css>none</code>&rsquo; or &lsquo;<code
+     class=css>contain</code>&rsquo;, whichever would make the contents
+     smaller.</p>
   </dl>
 
+  <p class=issue>ISSUE: &lsquo;<code class=property>none</code>&rsquo; and
+   &lsquo;<code class=property>scale-down</code>&rsquo; are a bit
+   controversial. Need some discussion on use-cases for each. Particularly,
+   is there existing content behavior (perhaps surrounding &lt;object>) that
+   requires one of these values?
+
   <p>The &lsquo;<code class=property>overflow</code>&rsquo; property
    determines how to render parts of the replaced element's content that
    extend beyond the edges of its box. See the &lsquo;<a

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.75
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u -d -r1.75 -r1.76
--- Overview.src.html	22 Feb 2011 19:52:16 -0000	1.75
+++ Overview.src.html	23 Feb 2011 16:37:54 -0000	1.76
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 		<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/">http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/</a></dd>
 
 		<dt>Previous Version:</dt>
+		<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-images-20110217/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-images-20110217/</a></dd>
 		<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-images-20090723/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-images-20090723/</a></dd>
 
 		<dt>Editor:</dt>
@@ -1035,7 +1036,7 @@
 			<td><dfn>object-fit</dfn>
 		<tr>
 			<th>Value:
-			<td>fill | contain | cover
+			<td>fill | contain | cover <span class=issue>| none | scale-down</span>
 		<tr>
 			<th>Initial:
 			<td>fill
@@ -1104,7 +1105,7 @@
 			the used width of the box and the height of the contents is greater than or
 			equal to the height of the box.</p>
 		</dd>
-	<!-- Commented out for WD publication
+
 		<dt>none</dt>
 		<dd>
 			<p>Determine the used 'height' and 'width' <a href="/TR/CSS21/visudet.html">as
@@ -1117,9 +1118,12 @@
 			<p>This value must act identically to ''none'' or ''contain'', whichever 
 			would make the contents smaller.</p>
 		</dd>
-	-->
 	</dl>
 
+	<p class=issue>ISSUE: 'none' and 'scale-down' are a bit controversial.  Need some
+	discussion on use-cases for each.  Particularly, is there existing content behavior
+	(perhaps surrounding &lt;object>) that requires one of these values?</p>
+
 	<p>The 'overflow' property determines how to render parts of the replaced
 	element's content that extend beyond the edges of its box. See the
 	'object-position' property for positioning the object with respect to the
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 16:37:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:01 UTC