- From: Rossen Atanassov via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:12:21 +0000
- To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-exclusions
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv15052
Modified Files:
Exclusions.src.html Overview.html
Log Message:
Adding David Baron's issue details about ACTION-415.
Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-exclusions/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -d -r1.23 -r1.24
--- Overview.html 14 Dec 2011 23:37:43 -0000 1.23
+++ Overview.html 30 Dec 2011 00:12:19 -0000 1.24
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
<h1 id=css-exclusions-module>CSS Exclusions and Shapes Module Level 3</h1>
- <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 14 December
+ <h2 class="no-num no-toc" id=longstatus-date>Editor's Draft 30 December
2011</h2>
<dl>
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
<dd><a
href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-exclusions/</a></dd>
- <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/ED-css3-exclusions-20111214/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-exclusions-20111214/</a></dd>-->
+ <!--<dd><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/ED-css3-exclusions-20111230/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-css3-exclusions-20111230/</a></dd>-->
<dt>Latest version:
@@ -1021,9 +1021,15 @@
<div class=issue-marker> <a
href="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083">Bug-15083</a></div>
- <p class=issue id=this-is-a-placeholder-for-david-barons-i> This is a
- placeholder for David Baron's issue about processing and positioning model
- of CSS Exclusions.
+ <p class=issue id=the-rules-for-exclusions-order-and-exclu> The rules for
+ exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely positioned elements
+ (particularly those with static position) build this exclusions model on
+ top of the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2, rather than on top
+ of floats, the existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1 and 2. The CSS
+ Working Group has not reached consensus on whether it intends to base the
+ new exclusions features in this specification on top of absolute
+ positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on top of
+ floats.
<p id=this-section-is-not-normative.0><em>This section is not
normative.</em>
Index: Exclusions.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-exclusions/Exclusions.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -d -r1.22 -r1.23
--- Exclusions.src.html 14 Dec 2011 23:37:43 -0000 1.22
+++ Exclusions.src.html 30 Dec 2011 00:12:19 -0000 1.23
@@ -668,8 +668,13 @@
<a href="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15083">Bug-15083</a>
</div>
<p class="issue">
- This is a placeholder for David Baron's issue about processing and positioning model
- of CSS Exclusions.
+ The rules for exclusions order and exclusions on absolutely positioned elements
+ (particularly those with static position) build this exclusions model on top of
+ the absolute positioning model in CSS Level 2, rather than on top of floats, the
+ existing exclusion model in CSS Level 1 and 2. The CSS Working Group has not reached
+ consensus on whether it intends to base the new exclusions features in this specification
+ on top of absolute positioning (as these sections of this specification do) or on
+ top of floats.
</p>
<p><em>This section is not normative.</em></p>
Received on Friday, 30 December 2011 00:12:27 UTC