W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-commits@w3.org > December 2011

csswg/css3-gcpm Overview.src.html,1.197,1.198

From: (wrong string) åkon Wium Lie via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:46:21 +0000
To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RfaAS-0003IK-M9@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-gcpm
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv12624

Modified Files:
	Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
revising text on exclusions

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-gcpm/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.197
retrieving revision 1.198
diff -u -d -r1.197 -r1.198
--- Overview.src.html	27 Dec 2011 13:47:30 -0000	1.197
+++ Overview.src.html	27 Dec 2011 16:46:18 -0000	1.198
@@ -3094,6 +3094,7 @@
 
 <h3>Exclusions based on rendered content</h3>
 
+<P>A new property. 'exclude-level', is introduced to allow wraps around the rendered content of the element. 
 
 <div class=example>
 <img src=exclusions-dropcap.png>
@@ -3109,11 +3110,11 @@
 </pre>
 </div>
 
-
+<p class=issue>define behavior if both 'exclude-level' and 'bakcground-exclude-level' is set.
 
 <h3>Exclusions based on shapes</h3>
 
-<p class=issue>Is this needed?
+<p class=issue>I suggest not having exclusions based in shapes in the first generation of exclusions; we may want to definde shapes for CSS in general (e.g., for borders), so we may want to wait until we have a holistic approach.
 
 <div class=example>
 <img src=heart1.png>
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2011 16:46:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:08 UTC