csswg/css3-images Overview.html,1.138,1.139 Overview.src.html,1.145,1.146

Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-images
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv24936

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
Fiddled with the issues.


Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.138
retrieving revision 1.139
diff -u -d -r1.138 -r1.139
--- Overview.html	11 Aug 2011 02:26:35 -0000	1.138
+++ Overview.html	11 Aug 2011 02:33:08 -0000	1.139
@@ -576,13 +576,8 @@
    class=property>round</code>&rsquo;), the box will simply be the size of
    the background sizing area. Similarly, for a gradient used as a
    list-style-image, the box would be a 1em square.
-
-  <p class=issue>It has been suggested that several of the controls offered
-   by gradients are unnecessary. Repeating gradients could potentially be
-   done by hooking into ‘background-repeat’, sizing and positioning
-   radial gradients could be done by hooking into ‘background-size’ and
-   ‘background-position’, etc.</p>
-  <!-- ====================================================================== -->
+   <!-- ====================================================================== -->
+   
 
   <h3 id=linear-gradients><span class=secno>5.1. </span> Linear Gradients</h3>
 
@@ -893,7 +888,12 @@
    are not displayed. For example, &lsquo;<code class=css>radial-gradient(red
    -50px, yellow 100px)</code>&rsquo; would produce an elliptical gradient
    which starts with a reddish-orange color in the center (the color 1/3
-   between red and yellow) and transitions to yellow at 100px wide.</p>
+   between red and yellow) and transitions to yellow at 100px wide.
+
+  <p class=issue>Brad suggests that we could drop the position/sizing
+   arguments and just use background-position and background-size. This would
+   force all non-background uses of radial gradient to be centered and
+   box-filling. Is this acceptable or not?</p>
   <!-- ====================================================================== -->
 
   <h4 class=no-toc id=radial-gradient-examples><span class=secno>5.2.2.

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.145
retrieving revision 1.146
diff -u -d -r1.145 -r1.146
--- Overview.src.html	11 Aug 2011 02:26:35 -0000	1.145
+++ Overview.src.html	11 Aug 2011 02:33:08 -0000	1.146
@@ -349,8 +349,6 @@
 	area. Similarly, for a gradient used as a list-style-image, the box
 	would be a 1em square.
 
-	<p class=issue>It has been suggested that several of the controls offered by gradients are unnecessary. Repeating gradients could potentially be done by hooking into ‘background-repeat’, sizing and positioning radial gradients could be done by hooking into ‘background-size’ and ‘background-position’, etc.</p>
-
 <!-- ====================================================================== -->
 
 <h3 id='linear-gradients'>
@@ -613,6 +611,8 @@
 	in the center (the color 1/3 between red and yellow) and transitions to 
 	yellow at 100px wide.</p>
 
+	<p class=issue>Brad suggests that we could drop the position/sizing arguments and just use background-position and background-size.  This would force all non-background uses of radial gradient to be centered and box-filling.  Is this acceptable or not?</p>
+
 <!-- ====================================================================== -->
 	
 <h4 class='no-toc' id='radial-gradient-examples'>

Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 02:33:12 UTC