- From: Elika Etemad via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:47:01 +0000
- To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css2-src
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv20121
Modified Files:
issues-lc-2011.html
Log Message:
Better summary of Issue 142, since we actually did address most of it.
Index: issues-lc-2011.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css2-src/issues-lc-2011.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -d -r1.3 -r1.4
--- issues-lc-2011.html 1 Apr 2011 21:24:03 -0000 1.3
+++ issues-lc-2011.html 1 Apr 2011 21:46:59 -0000 1.4
@@ -24,13 +24,14 @@
</ul>
<p>(There are currently no objections)</p>
-<pre class="d" id="issue-142">
+<pre class="a" id="issue-142">
<a href="http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-142">CSS2.1 Issue 142</a>.
-Summary: clarify terms like "ancestor box", whether referring to formatting structure or document tree. Spec contains only 3 instances of ancestor box. They are all in section 10.1.
-From: Bert Bos
+Summary: clarify terms like "ancestor box"
+From: Boris Zbarsky
Comment: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Sep/0126.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Sep/0126.html</a> #4
-Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0363.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0363.html</a>
-Resolution: Defer to errata
+Comment: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0443.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0443.html</a>
+Response: <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0040.html">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Apr/0040.html</a>
+Resolution: Partially accepted. Full clarification deferred to errata.
Status: No response
</pre>
<pre class="a" id="issue-153">
Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 21:47:04 UTC