- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:33:48 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16328
Pascal Blessing <pascal.blessing@gmx.at> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pascal.blessing@gmx.at
--- Comment #22 from Pascal Blessing <pascal.blessing@gmx.at> ---
The problem with transform and position: fixed was an issue for me for quite a
long time. Luckily I was able to solve it with some kind of JS polyfill.
However, looking up the position: sticky specs I've just stumbled across the
containing block definition of CSS 3
(https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position/#def-cb) which says:
"""
If the element has position: fixed, the containing block is established by the
viewport in the case of continuous media or the page area in the case of paged
media.
"""
which would conflict with the previous definition and implementation of Chrome
(and finally resolve
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20574)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 11 November 2016 14:33:56 UTC