- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:34:32 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27384 --- Comment #5 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> --- (In reply to Boris Zbarsky from comment #4) > > Can this single jQuery plugin really be behind 0.1% of page views? > > Could a use counter be added for that? Hard to tell, I guess, since it > might end up with random filenames. That would be tricky. One way would be to see if WebkitAnimationName has already been accessed in the same script execution, but we don't have any existing use counters like that. It would be useful in many cases, though. > > Sadly, the use of -webkit-animation-name is very high: > > I expect it would be possible to drop WebkitAnimationName without dropping > -webkit-animation-name if needed. But the fact that unprefixed hasn't > shipped yet is a bigger issue, agree. Yeah. I'll wait to hear back from Alexis, if unprefixing CSS Animations is in reach it seems best to wait for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 14:34:37 UTC