- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:52:14 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25411 --- Comment #7 from Paul LeBeau <paul.lebeau@gmail.com> --- I've added a couple of test files. The one labelled "Test combinations of specular exponent" has four squares lit by the four different combinations of the two vales of specularExponent. My recollection was that there were significant different between the three browsers Chrome, FF and IE when I originally reported this bug. Now the renderings still vary but are quite close. Perhaps bugs have been fixed. With the second file "Specular lighting of a raised ring shape ", Chrome is significantly different from the other two. FF and IE11 are similar, but not exactly the same. My experience is that almost any test file involving the lighting primitives will show up significant differences between the browsers. Perhaps the descriptions of these primitives need expansion or clarification to remove these differences. Or perhaps there needs to be more tests for these. IIRC there are only about half a dozen lighting tests in the test suite. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 14:52:16 UTC