- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:11:52 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24787
Bug ID: 24787
Summary: Remaining issues for sticky positioning on CSS
Positioned Layout Module Level 3 Draft
Product: CSS
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Positioned Layout
Assignee: dave.null@w3.org
Reporter: sl.ostapenko@samsung.com
QA Contact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
URL: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-position/#sticky-positioning
Issue 1:
Describe which element font-size-relative units are resolved against.
Issue 2:
Say what happens if this rectangle is empty.
Issue 3:
Say what happens if it already overflows the containing block
Issue 4:
Do marins collapse between the stickily positioned element and its containing
block element?
Issue 5:
Does the margin on the stickily positioned element affect its distance from the
flow root edge?
Issue 6:
Sticky positioning should really be defined in terms of the nearest scrollable
ancestor, but there is currently no such term defined elsewhere in CSS. CSSOM
View refers to "scrolling boxes." CSS Overflow has yet to pull in the relevant
text from CSS Box, and CSS Box has an old, confusing definition of "flow root"
which is almost (but probably not quite) what we want here. This spec refers to
"flow root," since that's the closest thing currently specced somewhere, but
this is not optimal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 20:11:53 UTC