- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:11:52 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24787 Bug ID: 24787 Summary: Remaining issues for sticky positioning on CSS Positioned Layout Module Level 3 Draft Product: CSS Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Positioned Layout Assignee: dave.null@w3.org Reporter: sl.ostapenko@samsung.com QA Contact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org URL: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-position/#sticky-positioning Issue 1: Describe which element font-size-relative units are resolved against. Issue 2: Say what happens if this rectangle is empty. Issue 3: Say what happens if it already overflows the containing block Issue 4: Do marins collapse between the stickily positioned element and its containing block element? Issue 5: Does the margin on the stickily positioned element affect its distance from the flow root edge? Issue 6: Sticky positioning should really be defined in terms of the nearest scrollable ancestor, but there is currently no such term defined elsewhere in CSS. CSSOM View refers to "scrolling boxes." CSS Overflow has yet to pull in the relevant text from CSS Box, and CSS Box has an old, confusing definition of "flow root" which is almost (but probably not quite) what we want here. This spec refers to "flow root," since that's the closest thing currently specced somewhere, but this is not optimal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 20:11:53 UTC