- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:59:22 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25475
Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |NEEDSINFO
--- Comment #1 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> ---
Thanks for the 'width' notice; it's fixed.
The spec *does* specify what happens if you provide a width of 0. Just follow
the algorithm as it's written; when the width is 0, 'pad' has no effect. We
can't make it somehow figure out how large it would need to be, because it's
not tied to values in any way; you can apply the same counter style to multiple
different counters. Even if we explicitly associated it with a given counter
as well, two independent lists could have the same counter name and counter
style, but different max widths.
Can you explain what the use-case is for knowing the number of digits a number
would occupy in a given base, from within CSS?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2014 20:59:23 UTC