- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:37:08 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17523 --- Comment #6 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> --- (In reply to comment #5) > Yes? "undefined" there is the JS value undefined, not that it's not defined > in the spec. That the behavior differs between strict and non-strict > similarly doesn't mean it's not defined in the spec. I was just providing further background about whether throwing TypeError causes an exception or not when attempting to write a readonly data property. In particular, the JS must be running in strict mode to see this exception. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 20:37:09 UTC