- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:37:28 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-19738-5148@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19738 Priority: P2 Bug ID: 19738 CC: fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net, howcome@opera.com Assignee: jackalmage@gmail.com Summary: Conformance criteria around omitted-unit zero lengths are unclear QA Contact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Windows NT Reporter: jackalmage@gmail.com Hardware: PC Status: NEW Version: unspecified Component: Values and Units Product: CSS The definition of <length> accidentally uses a "may" for the unit-omitting ability. This is okay as an author conformance criteria, but we need a must-level statement for UA conformance criteria. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 27 October 2012 12:37:29 UTC