- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 14:51:18 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17121 --- Comment #3 from Anton P <antonsforums@yahoo.co.uk> 2012-05-20 14:51:17 UTC --- Alex Mogilevsky has a counter-proposal. Conversation begins: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0588.html He argues that it's frustrating to have to define new formatting contexts in specs using wording along the lines of "they're pretty much like a BFC but involving box types other than block level". He observers that the term BFC is very rarely used to refer to specific layout type; rather, it is primarily used to refer to an independent layout container that margins don't collapse through and floats don't intrude into. Instead of introducing "flexbox formatting context", "grid formatting context", etc, he suggests that the term BFC should simply be used to refer to lack of margin collapsing and float wrapping. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 20 May 2012 14:51:21 UTC