[Bug 16912] New: Emphasize use of 'flex' instead of longhand properties in spec

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16912

           Summary: Emphasize use of 'flex' instead of longhand properties
                    in spec
           Product: CSS
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Flexbox
        AssignedTo: jackalmage@gmail.com
        ReportedBy: dholbert@mozilla.com
         QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net, dbaron@dbaron.org,
                    alexmog@microsoft.com
        Depends on: 16145


Per discussion w/ fantasai & alex, we want to make sure the spec strongly
emphasizes use of the 'flex' property (rather than the three sub-properties
which are likely to be split out in bug 16145)

We should have examples using flex: <integer>, flex: none, and flex: auto,
since authors probably want to use one of those options, in most cases.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 22:41:15 UTC