- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:34:55 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17778 --- Comment #2 from Anton P <antonsforums@yahoo.co.uk> 2012-07-14 13:34:55 UTC --- Proposal A: Replace: # Step 2: If the element is a block, list-item, or other block # equivalent: with | Step 2: If the element is a block container or block-level replaced | element: Similarly, replace: # Step 4: For all its in-flow, non-positioned, block-level # descendants in tree order: If the element is a block, # list-item, or other block equivalent: with: | Step 4: For all its in-flow, non-positioned, block-level | descendants in tree order: | If the element is a block container or replaced element: (Note the line break, which I think adds needed clarity). The suggested replacement in the former case has a dependency on Bug 17780 since it needs to exclude table cells. The suggested replacement in the latter case has a dependency on Bug 17779 since since it needs to exclude replaced table boxes. Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0498.html -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2012 13:34:56 UTC