- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:15:37 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16885
Summary: Hidden issues in spec source
Product: CSS
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Transforms
AssignedTo: smfr@me.com
ReportedBy: dschulze@adobe.com
QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: ayg@aryeh.name, cmarrin@apple.com, eoconnor@apple.com,
smfr@me.com, dino@apple.com, dschulze@adobe.com
There are some hidden issues in the spec text itself. I just listen the
comments that I found in the markup:
<!-- Does it actually this SVG spec? -->
<!-- Probably need more here. -->
<!-- Define "three-dimensional transform" ? -->
<!-- This section is normative -->
<!-- This "in the HTML namespace" is awkward. Is there a better way? -->
<!-- Maybe define "tranform container" in the definitions, and use it
everywhere
in place of "containing block"? I'm not sure if "containing block" is exactly
right. -->
<!-- clarify -->
<!-- Make this more mathy, with matrices? -->
<!-- More detail required, probably with matrices -->
<!-- (tighten this!) -->
<!-- Others? -->
<!-- This should not be in a normative section. -->
We need to check if they are still valid and how we need to address them. For
at least two of the comments we already have bug reports (6,8,9). Do we need to
create bug reports for the others?
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2012 16:15:39 UTC