- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:15:37 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16885 Summary: Hidden issues in spec source Product: CSS Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Transforms AssignedTo: smfr@me.com ReportedBy: dschulze@adobe.com QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ayg@aryeh.name, cmarrin@apple.com, eoconnor@apple.com, smfr@me.com, dino@apple.com, dschulze@adobe.com There are some hidden issues in the spec text itself. I just listen the comments that I found in the markup: <!-- Does it actually this SVG spec? --> <!-- Probably need more here. --> <!-- Define "three-dimensional transform" ? --> <!-- This section is normative --> <!-- This "in the HTML namespace" is awkward. Is there a better way? --> <!-- Maybe define "tranform container" in the definitions, and use it everywhere in place of "containing block"? I'm not sure if "containing block" is exactly right. --> <!-- clarify --> <!-- Make this more mathy, with matrices? --> <!-- More detail required, probably with matrices --> <!-- (tighten this!) --> <!-- Others? --> <!-- This should not be in a normative section. --> We need to check if they are still valid and how we need to address them. For at least two of the comments we already have bug reports (6,8,9). Do we need to create bug reports for the others? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2012 16:15:39 UTC