Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Details on "anchors-valid" (#10201)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-anchor-position] Details on "anchors-valid"`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: rename anchors-visible to anchor-visible`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;TabAtkins> q+<br>
&lt;ydaniv> fantasai: we decided to rename one keyword but not the other<br>
&lt;ydaniv> ... both refer to default anchor<br>
&lt;ydaniv> ... we decided to rename one to singular<br>
&lt;ydaniv> ... so do we rename both? or just the one resolved on?<br>
&lt;astearns> ack TabAtkins<br>
&lt;ydaniv> TabAtkins: I agree we should reanme both, because they refer to one single anchor<br>
&lt;ydaniv> ... if we need to for compat reasons no problem , so better to rename both<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> +1<br>
&lt;dshin-moz> +1<br>
&lt;kizu> +1<br>
&lt;fantasai> +1<br>
&lt;ydaniv> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: rename anchors-visible to anchor-visible<br>
&lt;ydaniv> astearns: objections?<br>
&lt;ydaniv> RESOLVED: rename anchors-visible to anchor-visible<br>
&lt;fantasai> Edits merged :)<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10201#issuecomment-4390233490 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2026 16:52:29 UTC