- From: Boris Chiou via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 19:16:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
So it seems we have to either update the spec for non-existing timeline name for `animation-timeline` in [css-animations-2] or the non-existing timeline name for "named timeline scoping and lookup" in [scroll-animations-1] to make their behaviors matched? They are talking about the same thing I think, but they expect different behaviors now (i.e. no associated with a timeline v.s. an inactive timeline is used). -- GitHub Notification of comment by BorisChiou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13807#issuecomment-4373808304 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 4 May 2026 19:16:44 UTC