- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 18:16:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
bfgeek has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-image-animation] Should likely rely on Web Animation concepts rather than creating new ones. == From a code-review with @DevSDK . The Web Animations spec spent a lot of time unifying the 3 different animation engines we had previously. See: https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#use-cases The css-image-animation spec should build off these concepts rather than creating another animation engine. E.g. while initially it may be relatively orthogonal to animations, there are some related concepts creeping in, e.g. cancelling an animation if an element loses its box or similar. The timing of these should be the same as animations, rather than introducing new bespoke timing. @frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13745 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 30 March 2026 18:16:32 UTC