- From: Yasuo Kida （木田泰夫） via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 02:20:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
JLReq TF: First of all, could you clarify the intended purpose of the value “none”? It seems that changing its behavior in this way may contradict the meaning of “none.” As an alternative, would it be reasonable to introduce a new value, such as “simple,” and align it with the behavior of simple ruby? -- GitHub Notification of comment by kidayasuo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5912#issuecomment-4114927450 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2026 02:20:33 UTC