- From: Psychpsyo (Cameron) via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:27:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
This might be more of a spec wording issue, but I'd like to throw it in anyways: The spec says > If component values can be omitted or replaced with a shorter representation without changing the meaning of the value, omit/replace them. "shorter representation", to me, sounds like if there's a choice between two keywords, the shorter one wins (i.e. shorter in terms of actual resulting string length). Although this would be problematic for backwards compat because anytime a new, shorter keyword gets added, it'd need to be made an exception. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Psychpsyo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8155#issuecomment-3814460332 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2026 23:27:26 UTC