- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 06:15:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Somehow I failed to find this issue and proposed the same in #13393. I came to the same conclusion as @AtkinsSJ for the syntax except I believe it could even work without the exclamation mark (or, alternatively, a minus sign). ~~~~ ebnf <custom-ident [none]> <custom-ident ![none]> <custom-ident -[none]> ~~~~ I also thought about allowing more than just keywords in the exclusions list. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11924#issuecomment-3809210272 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2026 06:16:00 UTC