Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-4] Consider removing the overlay property (#13200)

As far as detecting support, one approach we could take is adding a new [named feature](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-5/#support-definition-named-features) to the `@supports named-feature()` function for detecting support for the new behavior.  I'm not sure exactly what the new behavior is (is it that elements transitioning to `display:none` stay in the top layer during the transition if they were in the top layer at the start of it?), but we'd presumably need to come up with a keyword for that behavior, and make an appropriate tradeoff between being concise and being descriptive.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13200#issuecomment-3780885164 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2026 19:59:22 UTC