- From: Julien Cayzac via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 12:34:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Regarding terminology, I would understand `smooth` to provide some animation smoothness guarantees over just `fast`, but the proposal above would replace the current `fast` with `smooth` (to mean "fast enough for some animation" instead of "fast enough for _smooth_ animations"). I find it a bit confusing. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jcayzac Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12654#issuecomment-3728734793 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 9 January 2026 12:34:50 UTC