- From: Adrian Roselli via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 21:25:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I missed the previous comment, but want to highlight this with a note: > if the text sizing computed by `text-grow` etc at a 100% zoom value ended up being N CSS pixels, then at (say) 400% zoom, the computed style would still be at least `N` CSS pixels and therefore the size drawn for the user would be at least `4 * N` device pixels, thus satisfying WCAG requirements. I genuinely don't understand what this means (because it's talking about assorted types of pixels). _However_, the outcome must be that, to the user, the text has gotten to 200% of its original size. Pixel density changes alone will not satisfy that. As long as that is the outcome for users, how you math the pixels is probably fine. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aardrian Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12886#issuecomment-3712139036 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 5 January 2026 21:25:16 UTC