- From: Yehonatan Daniv via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2026 17:42:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@nt1m I think the idea was to follow the [`timeline-scope`](https://drafts.csswg.org/scroll-animations-1/#timeline-scope) property which also works the same across both `scroll-timeline`s and `view-timeline`s. Currently we resolved to change the behavior of this property to _limit_ scope instead of "lifting" it, nonetheless, I don't think we gave any thought about scoping a name that may be used for both types. On one hand, you may want to be explicit about the type you want to scope and not affect the other. On the other hand, it may be too specific to have to declare this per type? Anyhow, these should probably follow the same logic. @fantasai, @flackr WDYT? -- GitHub Notification of comment by ydaniv Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13279#issuecomment-3703938845 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 1 January 2026 17:42:34 UTC