Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] if using `display` we should provide examples for `inline grid-lanes`, and include the `inline-grid-lanes` legacy fallback (#10961)

I do think the two value syntax is better both for author understanding and for forward flexibility. I agree with @SebastianZ that our decision here was unnecessary and harmful for moving that direction, and with @Loirooriol that it's strange to favor the legacy spelling of a new mode that doesn't need that spelling. Is there any way we can take the compromise further, and favor the more modern spelling of new displays?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10961#issuecomment-3910756143 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 16 February 2026 22:25:20 UTC