- From: andruud via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 10:35:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I can't tell what this resolution means _exactly_ for all possible pseudo-elements, but if this requires us to track "how" a pseudo-element was matched (beyond which tree scope a rule came from), I'm very much against it. > `:host::part(foo) vs. div[part=foo]` [behaving the same way] I don't find that too confusing? You're getting `attr()`/sibling info according to what you're supposed to have access to, not according to how you're choosing to reach a certain element. That seems reasonable? -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12721#issuecomment-3890066185 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2026 10:36:00 UTC