[csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Should an explicitly skipped transition automatically be marked as handled? (#13463)

kevers-google has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-view-transitions-2] Should an explicitly skipped transition automatically be marked as handled? ==
When a transition is skipped we need to explicitly handle any promise rejections or an exception is thrown. Does it makes sense to treat explicit skips separately from implicit skips (e.g. resulting from name collisions or attempting to start multiple view transitions on the same element/document)? Propose that if a developer explicitly calls skipTransition() on a view-transition then the promise rejections come as no surprise, whereas other cases could indicate an error in logic. 

Discovered when adding WPT tests, when the test harness was complaining about the unhandled rejections unless suppressed with a setup option.

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13463 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 6 February 2026 16:37:55 UTC