- From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 18:55:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
That's probably the one. I think we'd potentially want these options… - `revert-layer(<integer>)` - number of layers to revert - `revert-layer(<name>)` - revert all layers above and including the named layer - `revert-layer(to <name>)` - revert all layers above, so we get the value from the named layer - `revert-layer(<something-that-gets-us-hints>)` - what this feature is about If we're ever allowing named layers in this function, we have potential conflict with custom idents – so we might want to use a reserved name like `initial` rather than `all`? Or we need some other way to distinguish the syntax, because `all` is a valid layer name. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13213#issuecomment-3849188256 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2026 18:55:16 UTC