- From: Guillaume via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 04:42:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yes, it is fixed by #13845. Not exactly something broken, but some things that generally seem to lack precision: - `<random-key>` produces `fixed <number>`, which is a *random base value*, not a *random cache name/key* - the *random cache name* is built from the `<random-cache-key>` but is not *entirely* specified with it > The [`<random-cache-key>`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#typedef-random-cache-key) specifies the [random cache name](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#random-cache-name) https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#typedef-random-cache-key But I assume these will be fixed as you refine these terms and definitions. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13827#issuecomment-4340848599 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2026 04:42:44 UTC