- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:03:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Maybe I'm missing something, but it simply feels like a bug (maybe a leftover from an earlier stage of the spec, when things worked differently). * It's not needed to have them in there if what we want to achieve is trimming the adjacent fullwidth punctuation in combos like `“（`. That's already handled by the rules of [section 8.5.1](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-4/#fullwidth-collapsing), which say things like “Set fullwidth opening punctuation half-width if the previous character is any of: […] a character belonging to Unicode general category Ps”. * it implies that these characters will be set to fullwidth by default (except in adjacent pairs), regardless of language. That cannot be right. I suspect they should just be removed from these categories. Unless I'm misreading something, or there's a reason they're there? -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13777#issuecomment-4206084465 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2026 12:03:24 UTC