- From: Kiet Ho via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 02:03:52 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'll assume if renamed, `anchor-visible` would only care about the default anchor like `anchor-valid`, right? Then I support 1) renaming both and 2) change their definition to only care about the default anchor. I don't support adding aliases because it doesn't make sense to keep the plural form when we only care about one anchor (the default one). Also I don't want to carry historical baggage. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tuankiet65 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/13768#issuecomment-4185999325 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2026 02:03:53 UTC