- From: dshin-moz via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 22:23:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
(Relating to "which rect to use" discussion that happened during above discussion) @tabatkins FWIW, [spec](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#clipped-by-intervening-boxes) does explicitly use ink overflow rect: > An anchor box anchor is clipped by intervening boxes relative to a positioned box abspos relying on it if anchor’s [ink overflow rectangle](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#ink-overflow-rectangle) is fully clipped by a box which is an ancestor of anchor but a descendant of abspos’s containing block. I think this is to handle fragmented anchor boxes. IIRC we made this change along with multicol-related position-visibility changes. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dshin-moz Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13176#issuecomment-4180800861 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2026 22:23:40 UTC