- From: dshin-moz via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 22:00:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
FWIW, currently `position-try-order` [says](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position-try-order-property): > This property allows an element to sort its [position options](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position-option) by the available space they define [...] Whereas "position options" is [links to](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position-option): > The @position-try rule defines a position option with a given name [...] Which makes it sound like `@position-try` the one way to define position options. ... But then the "Overflow Management" section [says](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#fallback): > To ameliorate this, an [absolutely positioned](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position-3/#absolute-position) box can use the [position-try-fallbacks](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#propdef-position-try-fallbacks) property to specify additional [position options](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#position-option) So maybe needs a bit of clarification. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dshin-moz Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13268#issuecomment-4180715866 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2026 22:00:34 UTC