- From: Steve Orvell via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 20:56:16 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> So I'm curious why you'd include rules in your mixin that you don't want to match anything? In the [example](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13727#issuecomment-4173757754), the idea was to expose something "part-like," as an exercise mostly. The `@mixin` could be provided by a 3rd party and if I want to limit it's "scope" to apply only within the "part-like" subtree, I can include `@scope` around the `@apply`. IMO, this is good, and as a component author, I'm happy to have this control and flexibility. -- GitHub Notification of comment by sorvell Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13727#issuecomment-4180431291 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2026 20:56:17 UTC