- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 17:13:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think this is a good testcase for having a has-allowed pseudo-element. But I think https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12630#issuecomment-3819888972 applies here too. (We could also make `:has(::pseudo)` have a different default behavior from `:has(tag)` and test for pseudo-attachment rather than descendant combinator.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11856#issuecomment-4179268757 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2026 17:13:56 UTC