- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:12:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Last year I made a merge PR correcting several names: #11800 I have not checked every reference, but I would say this is the only one left. Thanks a lot! I somehow missed that for last year's Snapshot. I'll go through the spec names in the current snapshot and check whether they're all fine now. > I do not know if changing a specification is an easy task, perhaps a lot of formal steps within the W3C are needed. Not much people seems to care if the word Module is include in the specification names ;-) But until the change is done, it would be better if the specification reference would match the real specification name. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12866 got approved already, so I just merged it. And while the CSS Cascade specs need to be published again to officially include "Module" in their title, I think it is ok now to keep the word "Module" in the snapshot. Therefore, I close this PR. I'll also check the other specs now to ensure they include "Module" in their titles for consistency. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/12865#issuecomment-3348878741 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 29 September 2025 20:12:35 UTC