- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:24:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed ``[css-align] Does `vertical-align` on table cell set `align-content` safely or not?``, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: when resolving align-content:normal on a table cell, we use safe alignment` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <TabAtkins> oriol: when align-content:normal on table-cell, spec says to use vertical-align<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: so v-a:bottom acts like a-c:end<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: in some corner cases it might be possible to have contents of a table cell overflow the cell<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: these corners cases aren't very interoperable, but I could trigger them in both blink and webkit<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: wondering if these alignments, then should be safe or not<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: spec doesn't say whether it's safe or not, so I suppose eit's the default safety<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: but browsers dont' agree with that or each other<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: Gecko I coudln't trigger overflow anyway<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: fantasai said probably safe is better, i'm fine with that<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: in general a lot of css2 stuff did safe overflow<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: it's a better default behavior in many cases<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: so given it's a legacy behavior, i'd prefer safety for vertical-align<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: other comments?<br> <TabAtkins> oriol: proposed resolution: when resolving align-content:normal on a table cell, we use safe alignment<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: concerns?<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: when resolving align-content:normal on a table cell, we use safe alignment<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12220#issuecomment-3329766354 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2025 16:24:43 UTC