Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-3] Can `background` syntax be made more future-proof? (#12849)

Somewhat counterintuitively, `#` is ignored when referenced by a property value range production:

  > Additionally, if the property’s value grammar is a comma-separated repetition, the corresponding type does not include the top-level comma-separated list multiplier.

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#component-types

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12849#issuecomment-3327978761 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2025 11:35:47 UTC