- From: Joey Arhar via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:41:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah I think that I was more hesitant to try doing actual height sizing based on the size attribute because of potential cyclical issues of trying to size the container based on the size of the options, but if we just multiply the size by something more constant then that problem goes away. We could multiply the sizes by`lh` or as David suggested to me we could multiply the size by the UA style for options: `max(24px, 1lh)`. > I lean slightly towards ignoring size attr other than for switching and perhaps just including a default minimum height of 3lh or something? This also sounds very appealing to me. I don't think that we can express the actual size as HTML uses it in CSS, since by default its 4 and the parsing could be different. -- GitHub Notification of comment by josepharhar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12510#issuecomment-3309924042 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2025 22:41:42 UTC