- From: dshin-moz via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:59:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
dshin-moz has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-anchor-position] Recent change in acceptable anchor element seems incomplete == With commit 184472e, as commented [here](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/184472ea2e2dc0bec28ee10849a13777ac02f741#r165727816): I believe the new edit is missing the blurb about the possible anchor element's penultimate containing block, that it should either be statically-positioned, or absolutely-positioned and occurring after the positioned element. As is, given: ``` <div id=abs-cb> <div id=positioned-el></div> <div id=penultimate-abspos> <div id=anchor></div> </div> </div> ``` #anchor isn't absolutely positioned, and its containing block, #penultimate-abspos is a descendant of #abs-cb, which is the abspos containing block of #positioned-el, satisfying this condition. However, it's laid out after #positioned-el. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12830 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2025 12:59:55 UTC