- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 22:00:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Per our resolution in #10325, everything in this spec operates on the flat tree (this is specified in the Values section of the intro). That still leaves the question of elements vs boxes for anchor-scope. I'm inclined to say it cares about element relationships. We don't want, say, a top layer element to escape the anchor-scope of its parent just because top-layers are reparented in the box tree; this is somewhat necessary to make sure that popovers can reuse the same anchor-name in repeated components. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12783#issuecomment-3286961703 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 12 September 2025 22:00:35 UTC