- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:42:16 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-conditional-5] Disambiguate scrollable/direction when along axis/towards edge`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Change 'direction' to 'scrolled', discuss keywords later` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <fantasai> noamr: We're currently using `scrollable` to say having the ability to scroll vertically or horizontally<br> <Rossen3> ack lea<br> <Zakim> lea, you wanted to react to fantasai<br> <fantasai> noamr: and then we are using `direction` for most recent scrolling direction<br> <fantasai> noamr: It felt that something was not totally finished in the naming<br> <fantasai> noamr: There's a few suggestions in the issue<br> <fantasai> noamr: Not super opinionated, but needs some work<br> <noamr> fantasai: miriam has suggested "scrolling" and "scrollable"; I think it kind of works<br> <noamr> fantasai: if it's now vs. recent if can be scrolling/scrolled<br> <moonira> q+<br> <noamr> fantasai: keywords for the scrolling direction can also use forward/backwards rather than x/y, or up/down/left/right rather than edges<br> <Rossen3> ack fantasai<br> <Rossen3> ack moonira<br> <fantasai> moonira: Just saw your comment, you mentioned scrollable as having none | x | y | block | inline<br> <fantasai> moonira: Do you mean changing those values as well, and remove values like top/bottom/etc?<br> <fantasai> fantasai: Wasn't clear to me from noam's comment about whether we were including the sides or not<br> <fantasai> moonira: scrollable is shipped, so prefer not to change that one, but for direction sounds great<br> <fantasai> moonira: If everyone is ok with Elika's proposal, can we decide to go with `scrolled` for last direction and use the keywords from that proposal?<br> <flackr> fantasai's proposal sgtm<br> <fantasai> moonira: Just want to make some progress here<br> <noamr> +1 to scrolled<br> <fantasai> Rossen3: Any additional opinions, or should we go with `scrolled` for last direction and keywords from the proposal?<br> <JoshT> +1<br> <Rossen3> ack fantasai<br> <fantasai> 'x-forward' vs 'x forward'<br> <fantasai> which style do we want?<br> <noamr> fantasai: there were independent proposals; up/down/left/right doesn't embed a direction but back/forward doesn't<br> <fantasai> flackr: what's that?<br> <fantasai> fantasai: physical axis with logical direction<br> <fantasai> fantasai: we do this for position-area, background-position<br> <flackr> I like hyphenated because up/right/down/left already have axis in them<br> <noamr> fantasai: the q is whether to have it space separated or hyphenated<br> <fantasai> fantasai: question is whether to use precombined hyphenated or combinable space-separated<br> <noamr> q+<br> <fantasai> miriam: Haven't thought through it, but prefer space-separated combinable<br> <djmarland> What would "left backward" do?<br> <fantasai> noamr: I suggest we resolve on `scrolled` as the descriptor, and we can ponder the additional keywords<br> <Rossen3> ack noamr<br> <fantasai> PROPOSED: Change 'direction' to 'scrolled', discuss keywords later<br> <fantasai> RESOLVED: Change 'direction' to 'scrolled', discuss keywords later<br> <fantasai> fantasai: Ok, let's come back to that though. It's confusing about whether scrolling towards or from the specified edge, so I think directional keywords would be better (in one form or another)<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12623#issuecomment-3275717227 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2025 16:42:17 UTC